For Presenters
Presenting scientific work at IMSCB goes beyond communicating findings. It is an opportunity to articulate your reasoning, defend your work before an expert jury and engage in focused academic discussion with the clarity, precision and rigour that define meaningful scientific communication.
Searches this page only — not the rest of the site.
Each session is shaped by three defining elements — scientific field, type of scientific work, and presentation format — creating a structure that places every contribution within the context where it can be discussed, challenged and evaluated at its highest academic relevance.
The field places each contribution within its appropriate area of medical science.
The type of work determines the scientific framework and evaluation criteria applied to each contribution.
The presentation format defines how the work is communicated and discussed during the session.
Session categories are defined by specific combinations of these elements. Original Studies are presented within a dedicated cross-disciplinary session, while Case Reports and Reviews are organised according to their respective scientific fields and presentation formats.
All Scientific Fields
Follow the key milestones of your journey as a presenter, from registration and abstract submission to final acceptance, presentation day and results.
Register as a Participant through the official congress platform and complete the payment procedure for your selected package. A valid Participant account is required before submitting an abstract.
17 January 2027, 23:59 EET (UTC+2)
Submit your abstract through the “My Account” section. You may submit up to two abstracts, provided they address different scientific topics. Any changes must be completed before the submission deadline. If multiple versions of the same abstract are submitted, only the most recent version received before the deadline will be considered.
3 February 2027
Following scientific evaluation, you will receive your preliminary submission status and ranking. Abstracts are ranked within their corresponding Scientific Presentation Session based exclusively on the abstract evaluation score.
4–6 February 2027
A dedicated re-evaluation period allows you to request a reassessment of your abstract in accordance with the procedure communicated together with the preliminary results. Requests must be submitted no later than 6 February 2027, 23:59 EET (UTC+2).
8 February 2027
Following the re-evaluation period, the final results and ranking will be published, and participants whose abstracts qualify for presentation will be granted Presenter status. If more than one of your abstracts qualifies, you will be asked to select one scientific contribution to present at IMSCB.
3 March 2027, 23:59 EET (UTC+2)
Presenters must submit their final visual support in accordance with the technical requirements communicated by the Organising Committee — .ppt or .pptx files for Slideshow Presentations, digital posters for Poster Presentations. The version submitted by the deadline is final: presentation materials cannot be replaced on the day of the session.
17 February 2027
The final Scientific Programme will confirm your Scientific Presentation Session, presentation order, date, time and venue, allowing you to prepare for presentation day with all relevant organisational details in place.
19 & 20 March 2027
Present your scientific work during your assigned session and take part in the dedicated Q&A and scientific discussion with the jury. Your final results and score are communicated by email within 24 hours after the Scientific Presentation Sessions conclude, and the highest-ranked presentations are recognised during the Closing Ceremony.
Abstracts may be submitted only by Participants who hold a valid Participant account and have completed the payment procedure for their selected package. Submissions must be completed through the “My Account” section no later than 17 January 2027, 23:59 EET (UTC+2).
Before submission, make sure your abstract meets the general requirements for length, title, authorship and eligibility. These standards apply across all types of scientific work and form the basis for a clear and consistent evaluation process.
The abstract may contain up to 350 words. Title, authors, co-authors, scientific coordinator, affiliation and keywords are not included in the word count.
The title should contain no more than 12 words and clearly reflect the focus of the scientific work.
Each presenter may submit up to two abstracts, provided they address different topics. Only one accepted contribution may ultimately be presented.
Each submission may include one presenting author, up to two co-authors and one scientific coordinator.
Once the general requirements are met, the structure of the abstract depends on the type of scientific work being submitted.
The structure of your abstract should reflect the nature of the scientific work being presented. Select your category below to review the required sections and key elements for submission.
Original Studies present original scientific work based on newly generated or analysed data, and should communicate the research question, methodology, principal findings and conclusions with clarity and precision.
Background — introduce the scientific context, establish the relevance of the topic and clearly state the research question or objective.
Materials and Methods — describe the study design, population or sample, data collection and analytical methods in sufficient detail to demonstrate how the research was conducted.
Results — present the principal findings clearly and objectively, focusing on the results that directly address the research question.
Conclusion — interpret the main findings in relation to the study objective and highlight their scientific or clinical significance, without introducing unsupported claims.
Keywords are mandatory and should accurately reflect the main concepts of the scientific work.
Where applicable, presenters may be asked to provide supporting data and the complete list of references used in preparing the submission.
Case Reports describe clinically relevant cases that offer important diagnostic, therapeutic or educational insight and contribute to a broader understanding of clinical practice.
Introduction — briefly establish the clinical context, relevance and educational value of the case.
Case Presentation — present the relevant patient history, clinical findings, investigations, diagnostic reasoning, management and outcome in a clear and logical sequence.
Conclusion — highlight the principal clinical insight or learning point and place the case within the context of current medical knowledge.
Keywords are mandatory. Case Report abstracts should be prepared in accordance with the CARE guidelines.
Where applicable, presenters may be asked to provide supporting documentation and the complete list of references used in preparing the submission.
Reviews critically examine and synthesise existing scientific evidence to provide a structured perspective on a clearly defined medical question or topic.
Introduction — establish the scientific context, the relevance of the topic and the objective or research question addressed by the review.
Materials and Methods — describe the information sources, search strategy, eligibility criteria and approach used to identify and select the literature.
Results — present the principal findings emerging from the included evidence, highlighting relevant patterns, consistencies or differences across the literature.
Conclusion — provide a balanced interpretation of the evidence, identify its broader significance and, where relevant, highlight remaining gaps or directions for future research.
Keywords are mandatory. Review abstracts should follow the applicable PRISMA-based principles and congress requirements.
Where applicable, presenters may be asked to provide the complete search strategy, supporting data and the full reference list.
Whether delivered through a slideshow or alongside a scientific poster, every presentation is built around the same principles: precise communication, sound scientific reasoning, and meaningful exchange with the jury.
A structured oral presentation supported by a visual narrative, designed to communicate the rationale, evidence and conclusions of the scientific work with clarity and coherence. The presentation is followed by focused discussion with the jury.
A concise oral presentation centred on a scientific poster, combining visual synthesis with direct academic discussion. Presenters guide the jury through the essential elements of their work before engaging in a focused Q&A.
All presenters must submit their final visual support no later than 3 March 2027, 23:59 EET (UTC+2), following the submission procedure communicated by the Organising Committee. The version submitted by the deadline will be considered final.
The slideshow should support your presentation, not replace it. Keep the content focused, visually clear and structured around the scientific reasoning of your work.
General requirements
Submit the final presentation in .ppt or .pptx format, using the official IMSCB template provided.
Use a minimum font size of 22 pt for body text.
Keep text concise and prioritise figures, tables, diagrams and other relevant visual elements.
All figures, tables and graphs should be clearly labelled and, where necessary, accompanied by a legend.
Sources should be acknowledged appropriately, with references included at the end of the presentation.
The presentation must comply with the allocated speaking time.
Recommended structure
Opening slide — title of the scientific work, presenting author, affiliation and the required institutional and congress identification.
Original Study — Background & Objective → Materials and Methods → Results → Conclusions.
Case Report — Introduction → Case Presentation → Diagnostic Reasoning → Management & Outcomes → Conclusions.
Review — Introduction & Objective → Materials and Methods → Results & Discussion → Conclusions.
Final slide — key references and, where appropriate, acknowledgements.
The number of slides is not fixed. Prioritise scientific clarity and remain within the allocated presentation time.
The scientific poster should communicate the core of your work clearly and efficiently, while providing a strong visual framework for the oral presentation and discussion with the jury.
Technical requirements
Posters must be submitted in digital format.
Recommended resolution: 1080 × 1920 px, portrait.
Use clear, legible sans-serif typography and maintain strong contrast between text and background.
Keep text concise and allow sufficient white space to preserve readability.
Figures, tables, graphs and images should be high quality, clearly labelled and accompanied by legends where appropriate.
All external material and scientific sources must be appropriately referenced.
Avoid excessive decorative elements or colour combinations that reduce clarity.
Recommended structure. The scientific content of the poster should reflect the type of work being presented.
Original Study — Background & Objective → Materials and Methods → Results → Conclusions.
Case Report — Introduction → Case Presentation → Diagnostic Reasoning → Management & Outcomes → Conclusions.
Review — Introduction & Objective → Materials and Methods → Results / Evidence Synthesis → Conclusions.
The poster should highlight the essential scientific message rather than reproduce the entire abstract. Presenters are expected to guide the jury through their work orally and engage in the dedicated Q&A and discussion.
Timing, clarity and professional conduct ensure that every session unfolds to the standard expected at IMSCB.
Be in the assigned room at least 15 minutes before your session begins, ready for any final organisational checks and prepared to present when called.
Remain in the room for the full duration of your assigned session and take part in the scientific exchange beyond your own presentation.
All presentation materials, oral delivery and Q&A discussions must be in English, the official language of the congress.
Keep strictly to the presentation and Q&A timings. Time signals will be provided during the session, and exceeding the allocated time may affect the final evaluation.
The final order of presentations will be communicated in advance and must be respected. Be ready to present as soon as you are called.
All official updates regarding your session, schedule and presentation requirements will be communicated using the contact details provided during registration.
A compelling scientific presentation is built on more than strong content. It requires a clear narrative, disciplined delivery and the ability to engage critically with the questions that follow. Every element should serve one purpose: making the scientific reasoning behind your work precise, accessible and convincing.
Know your work beyond what appears on the slide or poster.
Rehearse with the allocated time in mind, refine the transitions between sections and identify the central message you want the jury to retain. Be prepared to justify methodological choices, acknowledge limitations and discuss the reasoning behind your conclusions.
Guide the jury through the logic of your work, rather than simply presenting information.
Keep the scientific question at the centre, communicate each key point with precision and allow your visual material to support the narrative rather than compete with it. A strong presentation should feel coherent from the opening statement to the final conclusion.
The discussion is where scientific understanding is put into practice.
Listen carefully, address each question directly, and support your response with evidence and sound reasoning. When the available evidence does not allow a definitive answer, recognise the limitation clearly. Confidence in scientific discussion comes from precision, not overstatement.
The final evaluation reflects the complete scientific performance of each presenter, combining the quality of the submitted work with the strength of its presentation and discussion during the session.
Final score
During the session, the jury assesses the scientific quality of the presentation, the clarity and precision of its delivery, the strength of the presenter’s reasoning and their ability to engage critically during the Q&A.
Presenters will receive their final results and score by email within 24 hours following the conclusion of the Scientific Presentation Sessions.
The three highest-ranked contributions in each session will be distinguished according to their final score.
The highest-ranked presentations will be recognised during the IMSCB Closing Ceremony.
Registration as a Participant and abstract submission are handled on the congress platform. Create an account there to take part.
